Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update jenkins to weekly 2.489 #4

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update jenkins to weekly 2.489 #4

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

NxPKG
Copy link

@NxPKG NxPKG commented Dec 10, 2024

Notes for Reviewers

This PR fixes #

Signed commits

  • [*] Yes, I signed my commits.

Summary by Sourcery

Build:

  • Update Jenkins version in Dockerfile from 2.488 to 2.489.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated Jenkins version to 2.491.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Corrected SHA256 checksum for the weekly variant.
  • Chores
    • Updated Dockerfile to reflect the new Jenkins version.

Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This PR updates the Jenkins weekly version from 2.488 to 2.489. The change is implemented through a simple version number update in the Dockerfile.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Update Jenkins weekly version number
  • Bump Jenkins version from 2.488 to 2.489
jenkins/weekly/Dockerfile

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes updates to the Jenkins configuration files, specifically the versions.json and the Dockerfile. The versions.json file reflects a version increment from 2.488 to 2.491 and updates the corresponding sha256 checksum. The Dockerfile is modified to set the Jenkins version environment variable to 2.491, aligning it with the updated version in versions.json. The "lts" variant in versions.json remains unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
jenkins/versions.json Updated version from 2.488 to 2.491 and changed sha256 checksum.
jenkins/weekly/Dockerfile Updated ENV JENKINS_VERSION from 2.488 to 2.491.

Poem

In the world of Jenkins, a hop and a skip,
Version two-four-nine-one takes a trip.
With a checksum so bright,
It’s ready for flight,
A Docker delight, let’s tighten the grip! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eedb78c and 4530896.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • jenkins/versions.json (1 hunks)
  • jenkins/weekly/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • jenkins/weekly/Dockerfile
  • jenkins/versions.json

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

Version Validation
Verify that the new SHA256 checksum matches the official Jenkins 2.489 weekly release binary

Copy link

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @NxPKG - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Please ensure versions.json is also updated to reflect the new Jenkins version 2.489
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
jenkins/weekly/Dockerfile (1)

Update base image to use explicit digest for better security

Add the digest @sha256:1537a6a1cbc4b4fd401da800ee9480207e7dc1f23560c21259f681db56768f63 to the base image to pin it to a specific, secure version:

  • In jenkins/weekly/Dockerfile, update the FROM line to:
    FROM debian:bookworm-slim@sha256:1537a6a1cbc4b4fd401da800ee9480207e7dc1f23560c21259f681db56768f63
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 9-9: Verify Debian base image currency

Let's ensure we're using the latest secure version of debian:bookworm-slim.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check latest debian:bookworm-slim digest
curl -s "https://registry.hub.docker.com/v2/repositories/library/debian/tags?name=bookworm-slim" | jq -r '.results[0].digest'

Length of output: 199


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the current base image digest in the Dockerfile
rg -A1 "^FROM debian:bookworm-slim" jenkins/weekly/Dockerfile

Length of output: 90

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ad9b546 and 4a19c30.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • jenkins/versions.json (1 hunks)
  • jenkins/weekly/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • jenkins/versions.json
🔇 Additional comments (3)
jenkins/weekly/Dockerfile (3)

Line range hint 50-57: Verify version consistency across files

The version update looks correct, but let's ensure it's consistent with versions.json.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information to verify the version consistency.


Based on the output from the versions.json files, I can see that the weekly version in versions.json matches the Dockerfile:

"weekly": {
    "sha256": "74111bf3ce1216f7f8356c2cef22b854d099a5aef08b6d5ca8b1f6af0b86d42d",
    "version": "2.489",
    "repo": "https://pkg.jenkins.io/debian"
}

Version 2.489 is consistent across files

The Jenkins version 2.489 specified in the Dockerfile matches the weekly version defined in versions.json.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check version consistency between Dockerfile and versions.json
fd -t f "versions.json" | xargs cat | grep -A 1 '"weekly":'

Length of output: 155


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for version information in versions.json
fd -t f "versions.json" | xargs cat

# Also check for any other version references in the repository
rg -g "!{node_modules,dist,build}/*" "2\.489" --type-not binary

Length of output: 39280


Line range hint 1-5: ⚠️ This file should not be edited directly

The warning at the top of the file indicates this Dockerfile is generated via "apply-templates.sh". Consider making changes to the template instead of editing this file directly.

Let's verify the template structure:

✅ Verification successful

✅ Changes are being made correctly through the template system

The version update from 2.488 to 2.489 is being handled properly through versions.json, which is the correct way to update this repository. The Dockerfile is generated from jenkins/Dockerfile.template using the apply-templates.sh script, which processes the version information from versions.json. This follows the repository's intended workflow:

  • Template file exists at jenkins/Dockerfile.template
  • Versions are managed in jenkins/versions.json
  • The warning in the Dockerfile is valid and working as intended
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for the template file and generation script
fd -t f "apply-templates.sh"
fd -t f "Dockerfile.template" -d 3

Length of output: 1165


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the template structure for Jenkins specifically
cat jenkins/Dockerfile.template

# Also check if there are any specific instructions in README
cat jenkins/README.md 2>/dev/null || echo "No README found"

# Check the apply-templates.sh script
head -n 20 apply-templates.sh

Length of output: 2950


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the versions.json file for Jenkins and how the template is applied
cat jenkins/versions.json

# Also check if there are any direct edits to the Dockerfile that bypass the template
git log -n 5 --pretty=format:"%h %s" jenkins/weekly/Dockerfile

Length of output: 419


50-50: Verify Jenkins weekly version and security advisories

Let's ensure this is the latest weekly version and check for any security advisories.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants